Dallas Fort Worth Urban Forum

The Plague of Pancake Development

User avatar
vman
Posts: 77
Joined: 24 Oct 2016 07:44

The Plague of Pancake Development

Postby vman » 03 Oct 2018 07:32

https://www.architectmagazine.com/desig ... 7445c34dad

Great article on the look-alike apartment developments we discuss here.

Tnexster
Posts: 1576
Joined: 22 Oct 2016 16:33
Location: Dallas

Re: The Plague of Pancake Development

Postby Tnexster » 03 Oct 2018 20:48

Kind of my feeling about a lot of this stuff. Everything is turning into the same thing. You can go to almost any city and find it, beige boxes with a Starbucks on one end and Chili's on the other.

User avatar
vman
Posts: 77
Joined: 24 Oct 2016 07:44

Re: The Plague of Pancake Development

Postby vman » 04 Oct 2018 07:58

I really agree about what the author said about NOT putting residential on large streets. I cringe everytime I see those townhouses that front Ross Ave, Oaklawn, Canton..I could go on. Who wants to open up their front door and walk out onto Oaklawn?? I loved those walk up style townhomes on Canton next to the dog park. However, in the two years I lived in an apartment above the parking garage across the street, I never ever saw anyone walk out of a front door!

User avatar
The_Overdog
Posts: 350
Joined: 21 Oct 2016 14:55

Re: The Plague of Pancake Development

Postby The_Overdog » 04 Oct 2018 09:06

If I can be the contrary voice (oh I can!) I think architecture critics need to sit down and shut up for a while and this guy is no exception.

"where the miasma of the mud flats on which the Southern Pacific built its main West Coast train yards has turned into block upon block of indistinguishable barracks for the technorati, punctuated by the closed compounds of research buildings and laboratories."

Where were your lousy opinions when they were building ugly short houses across California?

even though those dense structures were so unattractive to most people, rich
and poor, that they fled to the suburbs as quickly as they could.


That's not what happened, unless you erase the financing and red lining aspects.

when the street is a six-lane corridor of cars and perhaps noisy trams, we should not force people to live next to that noise.


This is meaningless. The decibel level of a 6 lane corridor has the travel distance of close to half a mile in cold dry air. Instead, when the residential buildings come, the street should change.

Architecture should read this instead http://rationalurbanism.com/4%c2%a2-on-the/ and fix themselves. Important takeaway:
"buildings have actual functions to perform; like staying up, keeping out water, and telling people where the entrances are. The inability to perform those functions even marginally well is a solid indicator that they are not the equals of those they came before."

Or just shut up with the criticism that only has one priority- looks from afar.

Yeah, they are kind of ugly, but if they are "barracks for the technorati" (which doesn't even make sense- the 'technorati' are not an oppressed class and are able to make purchasing decisions based on superficial looks if they choose to do so) but so is everything else architects have built in the past 50 years. Except everything they have built in the past 50 years is expensive to maintain and not very useful.

So these pancake buildings are better in that aspect.


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

Login