Tnexster wrote:I'm not sure I understand why the developer would not want to maximize the potential of a property like this rather than just settle for a basic strip model design.
hjkll wrote:Isn’t Trammell Crow also doing 2000 Ross? It was supposed to have residential and now it doesn’t. TC is an anti urban company period.
vman wrote:That pool at the Fairmount is really active.
whit5125 wrote:Cant City Hall get off of their collective asses and do something for just freaking once?
ArtVandelay wrote:Have they delivered the 24 hour diner that was promised?
Matt777 wrote:Tnexster wrote:I like a good mystery
It's just so their lease sheet can have a certain ratio of parking spaces/square footage that higher than competing buildings. It's not based on actual demand. GROSS.
cowboyeagle05 wrote:Is 90% sold a blurry line as well? Do that many people actually live there or is it mostly purchases made for investment/resell? I ask this question honestly.